Twitter Ads vs. Facebook Ads vs. Google Ads

Twitter Ads vs. Facebook Ads vs. Google Ads

By Agency Creative
January 30th, 2014

No secret here. When it comes to your best ad investment, Google leaves Facebook and Twitter in the dust. After all, people come to Google in search of goods and services. People come to Facebook in search of pictures of birthday parties and baby kittens. It makes sense that Google ads will get more traction. But what about Twitter vs. Facebook? That analysis is a bit trickier.

Network Reach

In terms of network reach, Facebook delivers 1.15 billion users that share about 4.75 billion items each day. Twitter, while not as large, has 232 million active users tweeting 500 million tweets a day. This makes Facebook a better choice for advertising in reach alone. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Ad Performance

This is a bit harder. Facebook releases their metrics but Twitter plays things a little closer to the vest. Twitter ads have a higher engagement rate, according to Ad Age. As high as 1-3%. Compare that to Facebook at an average CTR of 0.019%. Remember, people are on Facebook to see pictures of Aunt Rosemary’s new kitty and share pictures of baby Francis’s first tooth. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Ad Costs

This is interesting. Facebook ads run at a cost per impression of about $0.59. Twitter, by contrast, hover at about $3 dollars and change. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Revenue Per Visitor

In terms of revenue per visitor, Facebook comes in at $0.93 per visitor, whereas Twitter is less than half that. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Ad Formats

Although Facebook has cut in half the number of ad formats offered, they still offer nearly a dozen different shapes and sizes. Twitter, by contrast, offers three: promoted tweets, promoted accounts and promoted trends. Twitter’s formatting is less about size and more about tactics. This tends to be a more workable system. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Mobile Impact

Here is where Twitter really shines. Because Facebook places most of its ad content off to the side, it is far less impactful on a smartphone. The Twitter ad shows up in the timeline, giving them more dominance on a mobile screen. This is smart. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Analytics

They both suck. Another reason that Google is eating their lunch.

Averages are Misleading

Consider this: Facebook ad performance varies greatly by vertical. Cost per impression for liquor brands is 45% higher than average. Looking at kittens and birthday cakes can drive a man to drink. So even though Facebook offers the better overall ad value in a pure dollars and sense manner, remember, your results may vary.

We are a Dallas Advertising Agency  specializing in PPC.

Dallas Advertising Agency_Twitter Ads_Gig' em

No secret here. When it comes to your best ad investment, Google leaves Facebook and Twitter in the dust. After all, people come to Google in search of goods and services. People come to Facebook in search of pictures of birthday parties and baby kittens. It makes sense that Google ads will get more traction. But what about Twitter vs. Facebook? That analysis is a bit trickier.

Network Reach

In terms of network reach, Facebook delivers 1.15 billion users that share about 4.75 billion items each day. Twitter, while not as large, has 232 million active users tweeting 500 million tweets a day. This makes Facebook a better choice for advertising in reach alone. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Ad Performance

This is a bit harder. Facebook releases their metrics but Twitter plays things a little closer to the vest. Twitter ads have a higher engagement rate, according to Ad Age. As high as 1-3%. Compare that to Facebook at an average CTR of 0.019%. Remember, people are on Facebook to see pictures of Aunt Rosemary’s new kitty and share pictures of baby Francis’s first tooth. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Ad Costs

This is interesting. Facebook ads run at a cost per impression of about $0.59. Twitter, by contrast, hover at about $3 dollars and change. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Revenue Per Visitor

In terms of revenue per visitor, Facebook comes in at $0.93 per visitor, whereas Twitter is less than half that. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Ad Formats

Although Facebook has cut in half the number of ad formats offered, they still offer nearly a dozen different shapes and sizes. Twitter, by contrast, offers three: promoted tweets, promoted accounts and promoted trends. Twitter’s formatting is less about size and more about tactics. This tends to be a more workable system. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Mobile Impact

Here is where Twitter really shines. Because Facebook places most of its ad content off to the side, it is far less impactful on a smartphone. The Twitter ad shows up in the timeline, giving them more dominance on a mobile screen. This is smart. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Analytics

They both suck. Another reason that Google is eating their lunch.

Averages are Misleading

Consider this: Facebook ad performance varies greatly by vertical. Cost per impression for liquor brands is 45% higher than average. Looking at kittens and birthday cakes can drive a man to drink. So even though Facebook offers the better overall ad value in a pure dollars and sense manner, remember, your results may vary.

We are a Dallas Advertising Agency  specializing in PPC.


Recommend this article:

No secret here. When it comes to your best ad investment, Google leaves Facebook and Twitter in the dust. After all, people come to Google in search of goods and services. People come to Facebook in search of pictures of birthday parties and baby kittens. It makes sense that Google ads will get more traction. But what about Twitter vs. Facebook? That analysis is a bit trickier.

Network Reach

In terms of network reach, Facebook delivers 1.15 billion users that share about 4.75 billion items each day. Twitter, while not as large, has 232 million active users tweeting 500 million tweets a day. This makes Facebook a better choice for advertising in reach alone. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Ad Performance

This is a bit harder. Facebook releases their metrics but Twitter plays things a little closer to the vest. Twitter ads have a higher engagement rate, according to Ad Age. As high as 1-3%. Compare that to Facebook at an average CTR of 0.019%. Remember, people are on Facebook to see pictures of Aunt Rosemary’s new kitty and share pictures of baby Francis’s first tooth. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Ad Costs

This is interesting. Facebook ads run at a cost per impression of about $0.59. Twitter, by contrast, hover at about $3 dollars and change. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Revenue Per Visitor

In terms of revenue per visitor, Facebook comes in at $0.93 per visitor, whereas Twitter is less than half that. ADVANTAGE FACEBOOK.

Ad Formats

Although Facebook has cut in half the number of ad formats offered, they still offer nearly a dozen different shapes and sizes. Twitter, by contrast, offers three: promoted tweets, promoted accounts and promoted trends. Twitter’s formatting is less about size and more about tactics. This tends to be a more workable system. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Mobile Impact

Here is where Twitter really shines. Because Facebook places most of its ad content off to the side, it is far less impactful on a smartphone. The Twitter ad shows up in the timeline, giving them more dominance on a mobile screen. This is smart. ADVANTAGE TWITTER.

Analytics

They both suck. Another reason that Google is eating their lunch.

Averages are Misleading

Consider this: Facebook ad performance varies greatly by vertical. Cost per impression for liquor brands is 45% higher than average. Looking at kittens and birthday cakes can drive a man to drink. So even though Facebook offers the better overall ad value in a pure dollars and sense manner, remember, your results may vary.

We are a Dallas Advertising Agency  specializing in PPC.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

-->

News

Agency Creative Hires Bart Hirneise as Executive Creative Director

A Partnership Thirteen Years in the Making

Posted on:

Thirteen years ago, an up-and-coming copywriter named Bart Hirneise was freelancing at Agency Creative. Recently on the market and looking for his next opportunity, Bart liked the vibe of the agency, the clients and, in particular, the CEO, Mark Wyatt. The two quickly formed a bond around their straightforward, no-bull approach to producing great creative.

Read More »

Blog

Hybrid and Native Apps - Which are Right for You? | Piping Fresh Blog

Much Ado About Apps

Hybrid and Native Apps and How To Choose

Posted on:

Before we jump right into the down-and-dirty details of app development, let’s dip our toes into why subjects like this are so important. We need to focus on mobile usability in general first. Let’s face it, mobile devices are ubiquitous and deeply personal. People’s phones have become their constant companion and first point of connection to the outside world.

Read More »

Contact Us

Agency Creative wants to be your marketing agency. We have years of experience, truckloads of talent and a bottomless supply of enthusiasm. Contact us today.

Please leave this field empty.